By Berthold Rittberger
Why have the nationwide governments of ecu member states successively endowed the eu Parliament with supervisory, budgetary, and legislative powers during the last fifty years? Building Europe's Parliament sheds new mild in this pivotal factor, and offers an important contribution to the examine of the eu Parliament.
Rittberger develops a concept of delegation to consultant associations in foreign politics which mixes parts of democratic concept and varied strands of institutionalist thought. to check the plausibility of his thought, Rittberger attracts on vast archival fabric and provides theory-guided, in-depth case stories of 3 landmark judgements within the historical past of the ecu Parliament: the production of the typical meeting of the ECSC in 1951 and the concomitant acquisition of supervisory powers vis-à-vis the quasi-executive excessive Authority; the delegation of budgetary powers following the signing of the Treaty of Luxembourg in 1970; and the delegation of legislative powers because of the adoption of the only ecu Act signed in 1986. this is often by way of the charting of newer key advancements, culminating within the adoption of the Constitutional Treaty in 2004.
The booklet offers a welcome boost to the literature on institutional layout by means of reflecting at the stipulations less than which governments decide on the construction and empowerment of parliamentary associations in foreign politics. It additionally makes a invaluable contribution to the applying of democratic idea to the examine of the eu Union by means of demonstrating that political elites shared the view that the hot supranational polity which emerged from the particles of global struggle II suffered from "democratic deficit" seeing that its inception, hence disproving the declare that the lamented "democratic deficit" is a up to date phenomenon.
Read Online or Download Building Europe's Parliament: Democratic Representation beyond the Nation State PDF
Similar comparative politics books
In recent times, political events and nationwide legislatures in additional than 100 international locations have followed quotas for the choice of woman applicants to political place of work. regardless of the fast foreign diffusion of those measures, such a lot learn has thinking about unmarried international locations - or, at such a lot, the presence of quotas inside one international sector.
The main entire, versatile, and cheap Comparative Politics package deal out there. necessities of Comparative Politics introduces scholars to the recommendations that political scientists use to review and evaluate political platforms and the details of particular political platforms. The textual content is obtainable with a corresponding casebook of 14 state stories and a reader—the 3 elements can be utilized separately or in any mix.
This publication offers a comparability of the styles of ethnic minority politics in British and French urban politics. A comparability of the participation of ethnic minorities in British and French towns contains direct comparisons of specific towns Birmingham, Lille and Roubaix exhibits how ethnic and cultural range interprets into political clash in several political structures Considers kinds of political mobilisation of ethnic minorities within the context of city political platforms, in addition to the ideas utilized by get together leaders and to control ethnic range in political pageant Analyses how ethnic and cultural range in city societies interprets into conflictual politics complements our realizing of neighborhood politics and of the evolution of political illustration in industrialised democracies content material: bankruptcy 1 old Institutionalism and the comparability of neighborhood circumstances (pages 20–36): bankruptcy 2 The British coverage Framework: Liberal Citizenship Regime, Depoliticization and the Race Relationism of British towns (pages 37–62): bankruptcy three The French coverage Framework: deliberate Migration, Xenophobic Politics and sturdy Political Exclusion (pages 63–91): bankruptcy four Birmingham, 1980s–2001: internal?
This publication offers very important and well timed insights into the altering coverage method within the sector of equivalent possibilities. The authors music the contributions of member states and strain teams to european coverage formation, and study the affects of eu laws on gender matters in legislations and perform. via combining special research of the ecu policy-making framework with nationwide case-studies, the e-book illustrates how diversified coverage types and institutional settings have formed equality coverage and impact implementation.
Additional resources for Building Europe's Parliament: Democratic Representation beyond the Nation State
E. 4 From a sociological institutionalist perspective, when would we then expect political actors to push for the creation and empowerment of the EP? For instance, we could expect isomorphic processes to be induced by a mismatch between commonly shared standards of legitimate democratic governance—founded on the principle of representative, parliamentary democracy—and the system of governance of the EU: since member states may perceive of the EU’s governance functions as ‘state-like’, the EU system of governance falls short of conforming to the standard of parliamentary democracy which EU member states subscribe to.
Thus, states’ domestic political institutions serve as a proxy for its political culture. Member states will ‘respond to the question of supranational democracy in the same way they have addressed the question of T H E NE W I N S TI T U T I O N A L I S M AN D D EM O C R A T I C T H E O R Y 25 sub-national democracy’ (Wagner 2002: 29, emphasis in the original). e. by federal states. . e. unitary states . . , are expected to prefer indirect parliamentary legitimation for the EU’ (Wagner 2002: 29).
13. Moravcisk (1998: 70) argues that ‘[s]ome national public, elites, and parties are more federalist; others are more nationalist. National positions concerning institutional form reflect these beliefs rather than the substantive consequences of transferring sovereignty. . ’ 14. V. Rittberger (2001), Baumann and colleagues (1999, 2001) develop a set of predictions congruent with recent developments in rationalist ‘neorealist’ International Relations theory. They abandon Waltzian ‘system level’ predictions for state interests derived from the anarchical structure of the international system, and turn to ‘unit level’ predictions.